Now Mitt has a new campaign ad about Hillary. He goes over the idea that Hillary does not have any experience running anything. She has not run a city, a state, or a business, but she wants to run the country. It is a good article and thank you to Hot Air.
Mitt joins the parade against Hillary too (video).
Friday, November 2, 2007
Fred Thompson ad against Hillary
OK, I know I'm getting lazy by posting lots of Hot Air stuff on this site. But they do the best job of getting the fresh stuff up and I'm happy to point everybody to that blog as often as I can. If they don't want me to do it or if I am stepping over the line by using their stuff, they can tell me and I'll stop. But here is a post by AP concerning a Fred Thompson video. It has the video in the post so you can see it there. It talks about how Hillary was finally pinned down to answer a difficult question about the illegal alien driver's license program. It is a good post so I hope you enjoy it.
Video: Fred joins the parade against Hillary.
Video: Fred joins the parade against Hillary.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Most agree Hillary LOST the debate.
As advertised, the Philadelphia Democratic Presidential Debate was largely everybody against Hillary Clinton. The most notable issue that people point to today is her answer on driver's licenses for illegal aliens. In New York, the governor has proposed exactly such a plan. In the context of the debate, Hillary was asked whether or not she supported the plan. The day after the debate, everyone is still wondering whether or not she supports the plan.
She initially defended the program as a good idea without saying that she supported it. She then fell back to the tried and true 'blame Bush' argument for failing to pass 'immigration reform'. When that did not work, all of the other candidates took her to task for being dishonest and manipulative. Dodd, Obama, Edwards, and even the moderators were trying to figure out what she said. At the end of the exchange, most of the candidates used it as an example of why nobody should consider voting for Hillary.
Most of the debate she spent dodging questions and figuring out how to sound statesmanlike. But for the most part, she came across as a pandering candidate only interested in telling people what they wanted to hear. She tried very hard not to say anything bad. But most people including the author of this article seem to believe that she failed miserably in this debate. Enjoy the article.
By: Roger Simon
Continue reading the article here.
She initially defended the program as a good idea without saying that she supported it. She then fell back to the tried and true 'blame Bush' argument for failing to pass 'immigration reform'. When that did not work, all of the other candidates took her to task for being dishonest and manipulative. Dodd, Obama, Edwards, and even the moderators were trying to figure out what she said. At the end of the exchange, most of the candidates used it as an example of why nobody should consider voting for Hillary.
Most of the debate she spent dodging questions and figuring out how to sound statesmanlike. But for the most part, she came across as a pandering candidate only interested in telling people what they wanted to hear. She tried very hard not to say anything bad. But most people including the author of this article seem to believe that she failed miserably in this debate. Enjoy the article.
By: Roger Simon
PHILADELPHIA — We now know something that we did not know before: When Hillary Clinton has a bad night, she really has a bad night.
In a debate against six Democratic opponents at Drexel University here Tuesday, Clinton gave the worst performance of her entire campaign.
It was not just that her answer about whether illegal immigrants should be issued driver's licenses was at best incomprehensible and at worst misleading.
It was that for two hours she dodged and weaved, parsed and stonewalled.
And when it was over, both the Barack Obama and John Edwards campaigns signaled that in the weeks ahead they intend to hammer home a simple message: Hillary Clinton does not say what she means or mean what she says.
Continue reading the article here.
$5000 for every child?
Hillary says that she wants to give every child born in the United States $5000 from the government. That is a nice way to buy votes from the poor. But it is not a very good policy for a capitalistic society. Why would she only stop at $5000? Why wouldn't she give everyone 10,000? And why does it only go to new born children? Why can't she give the money to living adults?
The bottom line is that this is a bad idea because it depends on raising taxes to give to others. It also may encourage irresponsible parents to have children just so that they can get another $5000 from the government. Isn't it enough that our government acts as a safety-net for people who need assistance? That safety-net many times is abused, and many times it causes more problems than it solves.
If Hillary wants to give her own money to anyone else, that would be fine. But her proposal to give everyone else's money to who she decides is dangerous. While it will likely give her votes, it is not good policy. Read this article about it and decide for yourself if you think it is a good idea.
Continue reading the article with the video here.
The bottom line is that this is a bad idea because it depends on raising taxes to give to others. It also may encourage irresponsible parents to have children just so that they can get another $5000 from the government. Isn't it enough that our government acts as a safety-net for people who need assistance? That safety-net many times is abused, and many times it causes more problems than it solves.
If Hillary wants to give her own money to anyone else, that would be fine. But her proposal to give everyone else's money to who she decides is dangerous. While it will likely give her votes, it is not good policy. Read this article about it and decide for yourself if you think it is a good idea.
WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 "baby bond" from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.
Clinton, her party's front-runner in the 2008 race, made the suggestion during a forum hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus.
"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home," she said.
Continue reading the article with the video here.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Romney discusses Clinton with Hannity
Republican Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney and his wife sat down with Hannity for an interview about his campaign in New Hampshire. Several of the questions were about Hillary Clinton and why she would not be good for this country. Romney compared Hillary Clinton with an intern because of her lack of experience. He also gave a variety of reasons that Hillary would be a bad choice for the presidency.
He goes on to discuss different issues with the upcoming primary and the general election should both he and Hillary get the nominations of their parties. Enjoy the article.
Provided by Fox News Channel:
MITT ROMNEY COMPARES HILLARY CLINTON TO AN “INTERN” ON FOX NEWS CHANNEL “HANNITY & COLMES”
Romney: Senator Clinton Is “A Lovely Person” But “Fundamentally Wrong”
Mitt and Ann Romney sat down today, Monday October 29, 2007, with FOX News Channel’s Sean Hannity to discuss Senator Judd Gregg’s (NH-R) endorsement of Romney and what Romney thinks of Hillary Clinton. The complete interview will air on Hannity & Colmes tonight at 9PM ET.
Continue with the article here.
I just think she would take America in a course towards Europe, which would lead us to be a weaker nation.
We’d have a weaker military. I think we’d have a weaker economy. I think our family structure will be weaker on all those bases. I think America would not remain the great nation it has always been if she were the leader, and that’s because this is such a critical time.
He goes on to discuss different issues with the upcoming primary and the general election should both he and Hillary get the nominations of their parties. Enjoy the article.
Provided by Fox News Channel:
MITT ROMNEY COMPARES HILLARY CLINTON TO AN “INTERN” ON FOX NEWS CHANNEL “HANNITY & COLMES”
Romney: Senator Clinton Is “A Lovely Person” But “Fundamentally Wrong”
Mitt and Ann Romney sat down today, Monday October 29, 2007, with FOX News Channel’s Sean Hannity to discuss Senator Judd Gregg’s (NH-R) endorsement of Romney and what Romney thinks of Hillary Clinton. The complete interview will air on Hannity & Colmes tonight at 9PM ET.
Continue with the article here.
Edwards criticizes Clinton's integrity
Here is another example of Edwards' claim that Clinton is not honest or trustworthy. He said in a speech last night that the entire system in Washington DC is corrupt. He says that good people get caught up in the system. He believes that Hillary is a good person, but he also says that she defends the system too much. These statements come before a debate tonight among the Democratic candidates. The rhetoric is likely to get more negative because Clinton is so far ahead. Enjoy this article from the AP.
By NEDRA PICKLER
EXETER, N.H. (AP) — Democrat John Edwards is trying to turn the Democratic presidential race into a referendum on honesty and integrity, areas where polling has shown that voters are divided about Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The argument marks a shift in a race where Edwards and Clinton's other Democratic opponents have criticized her stance on policy but usually have avoided taking on her character directly. In an interview Monday with The Associated Press, Edwards said Clinton is part of a corrupt Washington system.
"Good people are caught up in this system, and I've given some examples of the places that I think she's caught up in it," Edwards said. "And I also, secondly, think that she continues to defend it. And I don't think you can bring up the change this country needs if you defend a corrupt system that doesn't work.
Continue reading the article here.
By NEDRA PICKLER
EXETER, N.H. (AP) — Democrat John Edwards is trying to turn the Democratic presidential race into a referendum on honesty and integrity, areas where polling has shown that voters are divided about Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The argument marks a shift in a race where Edwards and Clinton's other Democratic opponents have criticized her stance on policy but usually have avoided taking on her character directly. In an interview Monday with The Associated Press, Edwards said Clinton is part of a corrupt Washington system.
"Good people are caught up in this system, and I've given some examples of the places that I think she's caught up in it," Edwards said. "And I also, secondly, think that she continues to defend it. And I don't think you can bring up the change this country needs if you defend a corrupt system that doesn't work.
Continue reading the article here.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Edwards Makes New Push Against Clinton
I would not typically agree with John Edwards. But here he explains another reason why Hillary would not make a good public servant. And Edwards is also Anybody But Hillary Clinton. Edwards' argument is that Hillary is a Washington insider. He says she illustrates the problem with the corruption in Washington DC. Enjoy the article.
Democratic Candidate Casts Front-Runner As Part Of Corrupt Washington System
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) John Edwards on Monday cast Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton and her ties to lobbyists as part of a corrupt Washington system that voters should reject in the presidential election.
Edwards railed against the "bankruptcy of our political leadership," an approach that his campaign said would be a major thrust of his efforts in the two months before the first nomination voting. With Clinton appearing to gain strength with every poll, Edwards seemed less to target Republican President Bush's leadership than to cast fellow Democrat Clinton as the insider whom voters should reject
"This corruption did not begin yesterday - and it did not even begin with George Bush, although Lord knows it's been present while George Bush has been president," the 2004 vice presidential nominee said in a speech at St. Anselm College. "It has been building for decades until it now threatens literally the life of our democracy."
Continue reading the article here.
Democratic Candidate Casts Front-Runner As Part Of Corrupt Washington System
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) John Edwards on Monday cast Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton and her ties to lobbyists as part of a corrupt Washington system that voters should reject in the presidential election.
Edwards railed against the "bankruptcy of our political leadership," an approach that his campaign said would be a major thrust of his efforts in the two months before the first nomination voting. With Clinton appearing to gain strength with every poll, Edwards seemed less to target Republican President Bush's leadership than to cast fellow Democrat Clinton as the insider whom voters should reject
"This corruption did not begin yesterday - and it did not even begin with George Bush, although Lord knows it's been present while George Bush has been president," the 2004 vice presidential nominee said in a speech at St. Anselm College. "It has been building for decades until it now threatens literally the life of our democracy."
Continue reading the article here.
The frightful specter of Hillary Clinton (videos)
Michelle Malkin put together this post about Hillary Clinton and why people should be skeptical of her. It starts out with a lighthearted point that the Hillary mask is the most popular for this Halloween. Malkin does a good job putting together video that points out the changes in Clinton's positions at the bottom of the post. Enjoy the post.
By Michelle Malkin
Hillary Clinton Latex Mask at Amazon.com: Only one left in stock! (hat tip - commenter Lan Astaslem)
Check out how many women and Democrats agree that Hillary Clinton would make the scariest Halloween costume of all the presidential candidates. The obvious point, of course, is that what sends chills down our spines is not so much her physical visage as the lifelong corruption, whatever-it-takes political ambition, and socialist poison behind the “let’s all have a conversation” mask:
Flashback Halloween Hillaryvids…the many faces and voices of Hillary Clinton:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/29/the-frightful-specter-of-hillary-clinton/
By Michelle Malkin
Hillary Clinton Latex Mask at Amazon.com: Only one left in stock! (hat tip - commenter Lan Astaslem)
Check out how many women and Democrats agree that Hillary Clinton would make the scariest Halloween costume of all the presidential candidates. The obvious point, of course, is that what sends chills down our spines is not so much her physical visage as the lifelong corruption, whatever-it-takes political ambition, and socialist poison behind the “let’s all have a conversation” mask:
Flashback Halloween Hillaryvids…the many faces and voices of Hillary Clinton:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/29/the-frightful-specter-of-hillary-clinton/
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Clinton Signs AIDS Financing Pledge
This is an article from the New York Times. Hillary pledged 50 Billion dollars toward AIDS research by the year 2013. It shows that Hillary Clinton is more than willing to spend the taxpayers money on anything and everything that she thinks will get her elected. I certainly appreciate funding for things like AIDS research. But I believe private donations from organizations like the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation does a wonderful job in this arena. In her defense it does seem like she was pressured by militant gay community in pledging everyone else's money. But she's more than willing to spend everyone else's money. Maybe they can have a 'gay tax' to pay for it since that lifestyle results in AIDS at a greater proportion than any other lifestyle choice.
Again, I am not saying that the search for a cure and treatment for AIDS is a bad thing. I just wish that Hillary did not think that spending everybody else's money was the most important thing she could do. I would applaud her much more if she put some of her own money toward this noble cause instead of pledging everybody else's. The main problem with Hillary is the tax and spend nature of her ideas. Like Rudy said in one debate 'We can't afford them all'. The article makes Hillary look good, but I'll let you be the judge of whether or not it is a good thing to be doing with our tax dollars. I am certain I will have plenty of posts about Hillary spending everybody else's money without a second thought. Enjoy the article.
By Katharine Q. Seelye
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton just signed a pledge that commits the next president to investing $50 billion by 2013 to combat AIDS around the world. She is also planning to deliver a formal policy on AIDS.
Gay and lesbian activists have been asking the presidential candidates to sign the pledge, which is being circulated by a global AIDS alliance.
Among the Democratic candidates, only Bill Richardson had signed the pledge. John Edwards and Barack Obama have issued AIDS plans and have agreed to many of the pledge’s goals but have not signed it.
ACT UP, a coalition of gay and lesbian activists, had been planning a demonstration against Mrs. Clinton on Tuesday in Philadelphia, where the Democratic presidential candidates are meeting for a debate. Some activists had been complaining that she had not signed the pledge.
Continue reading the article here.
Again, I am not saying that the search for a cure and treatment for AIDS is a bad thing. I just wish that Hillary did not think that spending everybody else's money was the most important thing she could do. I would applaud her much more if she put some of her own money toward this noble cause instead of pledging everybody else's. The main problem with Hillary is the tax and spend nature of her ideas. Like Rudy said in one debate 'We can't afford them all'. The article makes Hillary look good, but I'll let you be the judge of whether or not it is a good thing to be doing with our tax dollars. I am certain I will have plenty of posts about Hillary spending everybody else's money without a second thought. Enjoy the article.
By Katharine Q. Seelye
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton just signed a pledge that commits the next president to investing $50 billion by 2013 to combat AIDS around the world. She is also planning to deliver a formal policy on AIDS.
Gay and lesbian activists have been asking the presidential candidates to sign the pledge, which is being circulated by a global AIDS alliance.
Among the Democratic candidates, only Bill Richardson had signed the pledge. John Edwards and Barack Obama have issued AIDS plans and have agreed to many of the pledge’s goals but have not signed it.
ACT UP, a coalition of gay and lesbian activists, had been planning a demonstration against Mrs. Clinton on Tuesday in Philadelphia, where the Democratic presidential candidates are meeting for a debate. Some activists had been complaining that she had not signed the pledge.
Continue reading the article here.
Hillary Clinton's fundraising scandal Peter Paul video
I guess I'll start this blog with what I consider to be the best case concerning why Hillary should not be trusted. This video on You Tube was recently posted about her relationship with a fund raiser named Peter Paul. He raised funds for her Senate campaign in New York even though he lives in California. It actually shows video footage of her breaking the law with her fund raising phone call. It also exposes how she treats people when she wants money from them versus how she treats them when there is a scandal involved. She denies knowledge of an individual when a scandal erupts. But she acts like their best friend when she asks for money.
This is a 14 minute video that is produced very well. They say that this video is banned from the media. I have not seen it anywhere but the internet. Maybe it will show up in a week or two in the main stream media. I am very excited to have it as my first post on this hopefully popular blog.
Click here for the video.
This is a 14 minute video that is produced very well. They say that this video is banned from the media. I have not seen it anywhere but the internet. Maybe it will show up in a week or two in the main stream media. I am very excited to have it as my first post on this hopefully popular blog.
Click here for the video.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)